Consumers compensated by financial institutions still need to consider tax

 

With the ongoing financial services Royal Commission, and likely future cases brought before various courts for compensation — or indeed the present building of class action lawsuits on the back of various revelations to come out of the Royal Commission — the ATO has felt the need to run over the rules (as they stand) regarding the taxation of compensation paid to individuals for advice from financial institutions.

The ATO says that taxpayers will need to consider certain tax consequences if they have personally received compensation from a financial institution because they:

  • received advice from the institution that was found to be inappropriate, or
  • paid for advice that they did not receive.

The ATO says the tax treatment of the compensation depends on what the compensation is being paid for, and how an investor holds (or held) the investments.

A compensation payment can include some or all of:

  • compensation for loss on an investment
  • a refund or reimbursement of fees
  • interest.

The compensation may relate to multiple investments, with different amounts of compensation granted against each one. The ATO says an individual will generally be required to consider the tax consequences of each compensation amount separately.

Tax practitioners may need to contact the ATO for advice if their clients:

  • held the investments on revenue account
  • held the investments on trust
  • receives compensation related to a superannuation account or SMSF.

Compensation for loss on an investment
A taxpayer may receive compensation for a loss amount if the value of their investments is lower than it would have been if they had received appropriate advice. There are different tax treatments depending on whether the compensation relates to investments you have disposed of or existing investments.


Like what you're reading? Join our community of 13,000 subscribers and stay on top of tax and super news.


Compensation for investments you have disposed of
When the investor disposed of the relevant investment, CGT event A1 happened (and of course capital gains or losses made from a CGT event are reported in the financial year the asset was disposed).

The compensation can be treated as additional capital proceeds relating to the disposal of those investments. If taxpayer had more than one investment, they will be required by the ATO to apportion the additional capital proceeds to each disposal.

Most investors will be Australian residents for tax purposes, so if the compensation relates to investments held for at least 12 months they will be entitled to the 50% CGT discount. They may therefore need to request an amendment to their tax return to reflect the additional capital proceeds if the compensation relates to CGT events that happened in a previous financial year.

Compensation in relation to existing investments
If your client has been compensated for investments they still own, they need to reduce either the cost base or the reduced cost base by the compensation amount received, depending on whether they make a loss or gain when they dispose of the investments. Also it may be necessary to apportion the compensation amount where it relates to more than one investment.

Refund or reimbursement of adviser fees
A compensation payment may include an amount that is a refund or reimbursement of adviser fees. The tax treatment of this amount depends on whether the taxpayer claimed a deduction for the adviser fees in their tax return.

Deduction claimed for adviser fees
If a deduction was claimed for the adviser fees in a tax return, the amount received as a refund or reimbursement will form part of the taxpayer’s assessable income in the year it was received.

Deduction not claimed for adviser fees
If there was no deduction claimed for the adviser fees, the refund or reimbursement does not form part of assessable income.

However, where the adviser fees were included in the cost base or reduced cost base of any investments made, the taxpayer must reduce the cost base and reduced cost base by the amount of the refund or reimbursement.

The ATO advices that there is need to report any change of cost base and reduced cost base. The cost base and reduced cost base are used to calculate capital gains or losses when the investor disposes of the investment. Its advice is to report the resulting capital gain or loss in the tax return for the year in which the taxpayer disposes of the investment.

If a taxpayer disposes of these investments and has returned any resulting capital gain or loss in a previous income year, they may need to amend their tax return for that year.

Interest component
The interest component is assessable as ordinary income, and should be included in the tax return in the financial year it was received.

Example from the ATO – investments held individually
Noel paid $2,000 to a financial institution for investment advice in May 2010. Following that advice Noel invested $100,000 in a high risk-high growth investment fund. The investment fund performed poorly and Noel disposed of the investment for $70,000 in January 2015.

Noel had claimed a deduction for the advice in his 2009-10 tax return. CGT event A1 happened when Noel disposed of all the investments in his portfolio. Noel included a capital loss of $30,000 in calculating his net capital gain in his 2014-15 tax return.

The financial institution reviewed the advice given to Noel and determined that the advice was inappropriate for his circumstances as he should have been advised to invest in a more conservative portfolio.

In 2018 the financial institution offered Noel compensation of $40,000 in respect of the advice. The payment included compensation of $30,000, a refund of the adviser fees of $2,000 and an interest component of $8,000. Noel accepted the offer of compensation in June 2018.

Noel treats the $30,000 compensation for loss amount as additional capital proceeds received for the investments. Noel recalculates his capital loss for 2014-15, reducing it to nil. Noel will need to amend his 2014-15 return with the new calculation.

As Noel had claimed a tax deduction for the adviser fees in his 2009-10 tax return, the $2,000 refund of those fees is included in his assessable income in his 2017-18 tax return. He will also include the $8,000 interest component in his 2017-18 tax return.